wikipedia++ for recreationalXX

k_UGC

See also

–“Wikipedia++” is defined as

All the non-technical sites out there including but not limited to UGC [blogs, personal sites, bbs], but excluding news sites.

— disadvantages .. If you are serious about recreationalXX, then wikipedia++ is not the most effective.

You need to refresh! Print media is better, but see the “advantage” below.
Majority of wikipedia++ content (that I read) lacks editorial QC.
You can’t highlight a phrase as with print media.
If the topic is big, then you need many reading sessions. Wikipedia is often too brief. This has not been a problem in my experience.
Worst part of wikipedia++ for learning is the tendency to get distracted by curiositySou.

— Some advantages of wikipedia++ for recreationalXX