Hi Siva,
Further to my request below, I also need a spec for the fttp loader. Doesn't have to be detailed. Any spec is better than no spec.
Also, do we have a pre-defined test suite to verify a list of key functionalities? This will help us determine whether loader is 80% done or 30% done, for instance. Loader won't be 100% perfect. Without a spec, it will forever be considered “functionally incomplete”, or worse still, “functionally unusable”. Let's define a spec.
Tan Bin
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Tan,Bin (Victor) < tiger40490@gmail.com>
Date: May 10, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: complete code review
To: siva.tolety@verizon.com
Cc: bin.x.tan@verizon.com Hi,
From: Tan,Bin (Victor) < tiger40490@gmail.com>
Date: May 10, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: complete code review
To: siva.tolety@verizon.com
Cc: bin.x.tan@verizon.com Hi,
You tend to worry about the loader code having serious flaws. If one day for some reason I have to stop working on it, this unproven loader may end up in the trash bin and all effort wasted.
To prevent it, let's schedule a complete code review to confirm my loader does a number of useful things right. At the end of the review, we should be confident that this loader has non-trivial value.
Let me know when this could begin and how many weeks it would take. It's a time-consuming process but it's important to you and important to me.
tanbin